Organize cash, debt, and closing statement figures for boot exposure on a Tennessee 1031 exchange so the CPA can confirm the actual gain position.
Boot is the part of a Tennessee 1031 exchange that quietly creates a tax bill nobody planned for. It shows up in cash left over, debt that drops instead of carrying forward, or credits at the closing table that were never accounted for going in.
Boot is any value an exchanger receives that is not like-kind real property. Cash boot is the most obvious form, sale proceeds that never get reinvested. Mortgage boot happens when debt on the replacement property is lower than debt on the relinquished property and the gap is not covered with additional cash. Since the 2018 tax law change, personal property received alongside real estate no longer qualifies as like-kind, so equipment, furniture, or other tangible items bundled into a deal can also create boot.
Boot is taxable to the extent of the investor's realized gain, not automatically dollar for dollar, which is exactly why the calculation needs real numbers instead of rough estimates.
Property tax prorations, repair credits, and seller concessions are common on Tennessee closing statements and can shift the cash and debt figures in ways that are easy to miss if the settlement statement is only skimmed once. Because Tennessee has no state wage income tax, out-of-state investors sometimes assume the closing is simpler than it is, when the boot exposure question is a federal calculation that has nothing to do with the state's tax structure.
Seller-financed replacements and partial exchanges, where only some of the proceeds are reinvested, tend to produce the largest boot surprises, since the cash-out amount is often decided before anyone runs the debt-replacement math.
A usable boot worksheet pulls from a short set of documents rather than a rough mental estimate:
With those five documents side by side, the debt and cash comparison becomes a straightforward subtraction instead of a guess.
A seller carryback note is one of the most common surprises, since an investor who accepts partial seller financing on the replacement property has effectively reduced the debt on that side of the exchange, which can create mortgage boot even though no cash changed hands directly. A large repair credit at closing can have a similar effect if it is not offset by additional cash invested.
Excess cash pulled out at the sale closing to cover unrelated expenses, rather than routed through the qualified intermediary, is another common trigger, and one that is easy to avoid once the worksheet makes the cash flow visible before closing rather than after.
This worksheet organizes facts, it does not calculate recognized gain or file anything. The exchanger's CPA or tax advisor is the one who applies those numbers to basis, depreciation recapture, and the investor's specific return. Anyone assembling boot figures should treat the output as a starting point for that advisor conversation, not as a final answer.
The qualified intermediary and closing attorney can usually confirm the raw closing statement figures quickly, so the more time-consuming part is often just getting both settlement statements and both loan payoffs into one place before the CPA needs them.
Running this comparison before the replacement purchase contract is signed, rather than after, gives the investor room to adjust the offer price, the loan amount, or the amount of additional cash committed if the early numbers show a boot gap forming. Waiting until after closing to look at these figures removes most of the options that could have closed that gap.
Leftover cash is boot, and boot is taxable only up to the amount of realized gain on the exchange, not automatically dollar for dollar.
It can, unless the gap between old debt and new debt is offset with additional cash invested into the replacement property.
Personal property no longer qualifies as like-kind under current tax law, so equipment or furniture bundled into a purchase can create taxable boot even when the real estate itself is a clean exchange.
They can shift the cash and debt figures enough to matter, which is why they should be reviewed line by line rather than assumed to be neutral.
The investor's own CPA or tax advisor, using the organized settlement statement and loan figures rather than a general estimate.
Before, whenever possible, since checking the debt and cash figures early leaves room to adjust the offer price or loan amount if a gap shows up.
It can, since accepting seller financing in place of a larger conventional loan effectively lowers the replacement debt, which may need to be offset with additional cash to avoid mortgage boot.